International student scientific newsletter. Thoughts of the young people about them accept and dislike euthanasia, as well as about those who can be legalized against euthanasia in Russia

"I will not give anyone I ask for a fatal task, and I will not show a way for someone else to think ..." But in the end of the rock, the practice of keeping the life of a nevilikovno sick people, like unbearably suffering, is becoming more and more popular due to the zgoda of the most ailing, or most of all relatives. Medical practice is called euthanasia.

Above the word " euthanasia"Living in the XVI century, the English philosopher Francis Bacon for the appointment of" easy death. " New boom was empty of the company, as if it did not go into the distance of the battle to see the 31st operation from the visible chubby.

In the Danish hour of putting people up to euthanasia see. Well, it’s important, if the person is very suffering, and he himself wants to live out of life, or if those who are close to them have come to think, to pin their fellow citizens, then the viconati is very humane. Інші f, navpaki, save, that euthanasia gives the right to suicide, and the relatives of the ailing one should have a chance for the health of their corporeal goals. Even if ailments are found in comi and the permission of nourishment will happen to relatives, there is no guarantee that the stench doesn’t give a year, only if you cann’t get financial vitrats to look after him or speed up the procedure for catching up.

A country-performer, legalized euthanasia, In 1984, the Netherlands steel rots. Belgium and Luxembourg followed the Netherlands to practice, adopting the law on the voluntary exit from life and the role of the doctor in the whole process. In 1999, Albania allowed euthanasia for sick people in a group of 3 relatives who had been rejected. Since 2002, in Holland, they have allowed the establishment of euthanasia for children older than 12 years, and since 2014, in Belgium, a child, whether in any case, can deny euthanasia if it is obvious that his father or family is closest.

At the canton Zurich Switzerland euthanasia has been allowed since 1941, and at the same time suicidal tourism is growing there. Gromadians of England and Nimechchin, de euthanasia are fenced off, go specially to Tsurikh, to voluntarily eat from life. In 2005, pharmacies in Belgium began to sell special naboris, designated for euthanasia. Before the warehouse, the set includes a disposable syringe with a twist-off handle and for carrying out an inspection. You can buy such a set for about 60 EUR for a recipe for a liquor.

V USA euthanasia is allowed in 4 states - Oregon, Washington, Georgia and Vermont. In the largest states, there is no legitimacy for euthanasia, there you regularly add mass information to public information about those American politicians who go against the law and help gravely ill people put their hands on themselves.

good luck CRIMINAL CODE OF AZERBAIJAN, Lykarya, as a dopomig in a voluntary exit from the life of a seriously ill patient, checking for punishment at the prison's prisoner up to 3 years of restraint of the right to practice for the profession. In Russia, euthanasia may be subject to criminal evil and punishable by law. In a large number of cases, when the world is recognized, they will get accustomed to the punishment, as there is no proof that, if there is a problem, there will be a motive of spirits present.

Have euthanasia If you have any procedure, you should know your pluses and minus, but you should be aware of the principled inadmissibility of the procedure anyway. Plusi is the argument for, and minusi is the argument against:

arguments for:
- For the appearance of the life of a sick person who is sick, like suffering from unbearable pains, a lot of needs are needed;
- nevilikovna ailment before degradation, it means, a fatal prick - a lot of people’s pangs are a thrust for loved ones and a chance to get lost in their memory in the best quality;
- If the countrymen are overwhelmed by the contented, the negativities over the positive, life is no good for the people.

argue against:
- it is important to create the correct vibration between lives and death, if a person is suffering, or if he is the closest relative;
- nichto does not have the right to virishuvati, to whom to live, to whom - to die;
- suicide is a great sin;
- life є with a good blessing, і fighting for its needs to the rest of the hilin.

Video lesson about euthanasia - Jack Kevorkian. Doctor vbivtsya abo fahivets z euthanasia?

Turn into zm_st rozdila "

- I would call my position before the problem of euthanasia foldable. Moreover, what is more confused with the problem, it is more ambiguous before it was put. The anesthesiologists-reanimatologists themselves are basically “to seize the last ruble”. And we ourselves often, not the doctors of the other specialties, except the pathologists and the medical doctors of the ships, singingly, get stuck with "unpromising" patients. I am navmisno omitting the food here, tied up with the bazhanya of the patient. For a dare, a patient in a critical camp - between life and death - it is not often possible for me to loosen up my bastards again and again. It’s even more likely that I’ll be able to find a solution and a family of people - relatives, doctors and bagatokh-bagatokhs, right up to Chergov electricians and lifters.

In our country, the number of hospitals is provided and there is no system of foster care for sick patients at home.

Especially great problems in the organization of trivial prosthetics of life important functions in the home minds, zokrema, piece ventilation lungs. Through a large number of “unpromising” patients, they appear in the form of reanimation and intensive therapy, and sometimes they “hang out” on a few months of rock. The lack of prospects for the treatment of children for physicians is obvious due to the professional knowledge about the nature of the disease and life.

Speak about euthanasia, call up to see the patients in the incurable camp (i.e. with free methods), I see a lot of citizens from ailments and related to medical procedures. Ale, it is important not to forget about the quietly ailing people, whose stats cannot be expected in the rest of the world to name their lives. I think I’m going to be very comatose and will actually die of the brain - this is how I’ll become vegetative. From a trivial, unenlightened ailment, relatives are more tired - even more importantly in months to cleanse death close people; it is not easy to run around with these. On any such patient, resources will inevitably be used up: they are busy with lizko, equipment, vikoristoyutsya drugs, professional staff. All this could have been victorious for the little ones who are quiet, who can be saved in the quality of the new members of the suspension. With regard to the urahuvannya of "sickly" the hopeful of patients in critical countries ("now thick, now empty"), it is early and practically inevitable that the situation of shortage of resources is inevitable, since the time of saving life for one thing means death. I'll aim the butt. All the obvious trips and equipment in the form of reanimation of important ailments - it is clear that there is no “vikinuti” possible. The first patient with the great internal bleeding of the brigade of "shvidkoy help" is brought to the hospital. The increase in the triviality of transport is fatal for the newcomer. I would like, if there is a lack of vision, there is a chance of seeing the bully be seen from zero.

Well, it’s melodiously saying that it’s necessary to take vitrati to protect health and reserve it, so that all the “promising” patients lived and saw it.

Tse good pobozhannya not wiklikє zaprechen, ale life take, yakim є. Let it be admitted that if there is no need to add medical resources to all the big people in a "wicked" life (by itself, induce communism by itself). Sooner and more, here inevitably there will be a concentration of a great number of patients. Road transport for the fate of the bus, earthquake, epidemic, litaka catastrophe, terrorist act, great pozhezha, vіyskovі dії - all the butt of superfluous situations, how to supervise overgrowth medical aid... Patients are rich, and physicians and their obvious resources are few. In such situations, physicians have to accept a difficult decision - as a rank of the development of intercourse of medical resources (people, forces, hours, people, equipment, etc.), Shcheb saw the maximum number of sufferers. There will inevitably appear obscenities. Building b, in the most significant situations of euthanasia of the patient in the hopeless camp of the humane, not only in terms of living up to the new one (more quickly the citizens), but to the very few people, who in the hospitable need of medical resources became specific

On the other hand, apparently about euthanasia, it is impossible not to ruin the food about "euthanasiologists": who is it himself who is guilty of carrying out the procedure? Mirkuyu about "the need for euthanasia" be ready to talk a lot, but you don't want to be a visitor. Ade between the euthanasia and the drive to finish the hit - both in the sense of a youthful criminal repetition, as well as in the moral and ethical plan. One on the right is mirkuvati, theoretically, and let them please the people, and in the same - viconatie euthanasia with their own hands. Let us share the old history. We have seen a living child.

The child's stance was agonal, none of those illusions were seen - only the last years of life, piecemeal with medical technology and legends. The medical sister is even more successful and really good (at that time she was already a student of the last course of the medical institute).

The argument of the bullet is open and elegantly primed. In the bag, the doctor has all the way to grow and proponate the device, as long as it is correct. Dіvchina іdmovilasya. It’s not so easy to press a button, I know that in advance, as a result of your work, people will die immediately. The stench of the patient with the great difficulties "reached" the wound - the wine died in a few years.

At the beginning of the day from the very first day, an ethical foundation is laid - everything is possible for a patient's life. A spilna struggle for someone else's life with minimal chances and inevitable losses from a group of reanimated revivals: the spirits of the mind are one by one, often without any words. The concept of "euthanasia" is in a very super-versatile way with a basic moral principle. It’s not easy to solve a conflict in the middle, it’s not easy for me to create. Nіhto from us without looking into the "book dol". Tyagar accepted solution and vikonannya for such a level is immensely important.

One more important aspect. For an hour of my professional activity, medical technologies have changed. Today's vision and vision of patients, illnesses and I will become, apparently recently, “hopeless” for medicine. Yakbi physicians took care of euthanasia on the basis of negative news, then none of them came to the test. At the top of the note, I am taking a direct view of the food about my being put before the legalization of euthanasia and giving the children a message with the devise: "It’s a matter of guilt - and let’s be yours."

Hirurg-oncologist, director and forecaster of the Eurasian Federation of Oncology Somasundaram Subramanian:

- Euthanasia's food is duzhe spirne. On one side, life is the price of the greatest value, and a very humane suspension, cherished by high moral and ethical principles, the ability to help the hopeless and important to watch the ailments. At the XXI century, I’ll look at all the colossal advances in medicine and pharmacology, it’s hard to let it go, but we have the right to proclaim death to the patients! It is necessary to devise new methods and methods, as it is not only to carry on the life of the sickly sick, but, more importantly, to make sure that you are sick. Make sure you think about it with great importance, when you are a person until the end of your days, you become a regular member of the staff and a specialty.

From the other side, to help relieve the terminal patient from physical citizens necessary look for the help of a piece of equipment and technologies), it is hard to cleanse the patient from mental anguish.

For the young people, the thought itself is about life in a desperate camp, if the stench is constantly snarling for help, don’t know how to reach close people, it’s unacceptable, and the stench is afraid of becoming a drag for your loved ones. To that it is necessary to preserve the skin of the person with the right choice.

Protest, in my sight, in Russia from far away from the legalization of euthanasia. Before accepting such a decision, it is necessary to establish a specific infrastructure, which includes the preparation of competent doctors and medical personnel, lawyers and medical education... Critical development of ma mother and community support.

As long as I am participating in the legalization of euthanasia in Russia. Likar that suspension, in general, do not blame them on the problem of thermal patients, the simplest and most frightening way is vibrating.

Anesthesiologist-resuscitator, candidate of medical sciences Marya Menshikh:

- At this stage, the development of the legalization of euthanasia is undesirable. Advantage, or even an increase in vitality, has been cultivated not without the participation of the government and a number of people in the suspension for the period of treatment to licenses, depriving them of trying to legalize euthanasia. The legalization of euthanasia is made to deprive the age of being grown up about “lykariv-murderer”, moreover, “vbivts” is in the direct sense of the word. The absolute legal lack of protection of personalities, the presence of an adequate legal approach (it is no secret that the qualifications of lawyers in the hospitals are filled with good) on the other side of the administrative court on the right. Before legalizing euthanasia, it is necessary to have an educational campaign in ZMI, as well as the development of legislation to address these problems, in which the whole procedure for taking decisions about euthanasia is clearly spelled out, and the statutes of the law are not allowed.

My special position before euthanasia is ambiguous.

On one side, I am mindful that the countrymen of the nevilikovy sick man are lodged - the good is on the right. From the bottom - why is there a moral right for a person to take a decision about the inclusion of systems of life-safety (do not hey, not uniaxially, but on consilium) and do we actually accustom ourselves to the Lord God? (It’s a little loud - I don’t see myself before the next confessions, I want and see a corncob in the presence). I still didn’t know about the food price.

1. To pass over, suicide is for sprying or euthanasia - tse "death in a god," so as you see it shvidko. To go, well, that does not go into the world quickly, to die without gidnost.

2. Suicide for spriyannya ruinuє the sign of the medical establishment: lіkuvati ailments, ryatuvati life і zmenshuvati bіl. I would like to include the entry of patients into the list " medical services", Tse stane zazikhannyam on the very essence of medicine.

3. Suicide for spriyannya to rob people, as they bazhayut to speed up with "services", huge people of a different sort. It’s a lyudin, who’s not depressed, can’t pretend to be helped in the face of life, but a man in depres- sion - perhaps, it means that the state is actually supported, but the life of a man because of depres- sion is mensh cynna.

4. Euthanazia vimagak, schob power i medical mortgage It was the beginning of the life of people. As a result, people with ample opportunities become people of a different kind, so as their life is less valuable, not the life of people without disability. To the fathers of children-invalids in Belgium to please the children of euthanasia. Euthanasia, in the Greek language - "death is good", put in the wilderness as Evgenika - in the walnut "good folk". So, like an abortion, it’s possible to drive non-married children with Down's syndrome and other failures, euthanasia is victorious, people have already been born, ale mensh thoroughly, below the bottom.

5. Suicide for wiping out the cordoni. As long as there is a suffering from a mental illness and I have the right to quickly finance with a hot line for suckers, then how are some operators to blame? To bring people up to suicide? Would there be such a grip on the "ruined" of the new "rights" of the colossus in the state, if the order would permit the driving? Aje yak tilki bulo virisheno, scho the woman has the "right" to abortion, people immediately felt the call of the abortion, but the woman got married from abortion, in the broken "rights".

6. Suicide for trying to rob people who have been rocked to suicide, who are more teasing, so that, having legalized the power for people to beat them in, the order confirms that people cannot live.

7. Suicide for sprying is given a new term "lyki", which is now known and deadly spirits, scribbled by a lykar with a clear intent to beat a ludin.

8. Suicide for svryyanya svoryunove, vigadane right - "the right to die." At the root, the right to life, from which one cannot be seen, is given the right to live voluntarily. "The right to die" is a legal absurdity.

9. Giving the state and the courts the right to legalize the imprisonment is a superbly insecure croc, which is a little distant inheritance. The Netherlands have a lot of people becoming victims of "primus euthanasia".

10. It is legal to give medical doctors a legal right to drive in, to navigate in the surrounding surroundings, and it is not intelligent, and it is not safe. If you criminate with the right, you may be pricked up a likarsku nedbalist or wrong likuvannya. I similar precedents in the same bully European countries, De euthanasia is legalized.

11. Children can squeeze on daddy, but they are speeding up with a new "servant". Such boules vipes have been recorded in the USA and Europe. If people live for a long time and try to spare their sparing on themselves, it is awkward to transfer the reaction of hisistic sine, which is to blame, yak this decline.

12. I stand up for the legalization of euthanasia to ignore the fact that people can use the grip of a vice and vicarious service for other reasons. For example, the legalization of euthanasia for children in Belgium ignores the fact that children can get a grip on their interests.

13. The debate is not blamed, on the other hand, it is the culprit that the stage of euthanasia has been concluded. So the name "zapobizhni come" appeared to be illusory or ineffective in all jurisdictions, de euthanasia is legalized. Seemingly, even more so, how much more majesty lodged, as soon as the attempt to commit suicide has appeared not far away, but we cannot support the victims of euthanasia, shkoduyut stench about their decision.

14. Suicide for spiriting carries in its basis the light principle: after the death of no one is dumb, suicide is not injected into it. Tse was singed out on its own. Yakshho, as a Christianity (and practically all civilization has gone until recently), the life of death is true, suicide is the whole thing, and there are no great moral inheritances.

15. Suicide for sprying yak moral nourishment (and yak yakhey look out?) That, who is pragmatic before the legalization of euthanasia, they simply took a dumka for an axiom, but suicide for sprying is right, if you didn’t destroy your euthanasia and try to formulate your viral philosophy, you should illustrate what it’s like that.

16. The evil of Euthanasia is being seen everywhere, it has become legal: for example, the judges in the Netherlands allowed some family to send their old fathers to the Euthanasia, as they were guarding the Dementia, they didn’t want to prove that they weren’t the stench wanted to die.

17. In the lands, euthanasia has been de-legalized, to increase prices for "service". Belgium and the Netherlands have a great number of people dying as a result of euthanasia.

18. Fakhіvtsі from ethics napolyagayut on the fact that "Primusova euthanasia" - and, in fact, vbivstvo - for children guilty but it is legalized. In the Netherlands, it has already started (Groningen Protocol 2004).

19. Suicide for spryannya and euthanasia znetsinuyut human life. Aje medical establish the people who are suffering are put to death in such a way that they can burn home creatures.

20. There, de suicide for trying to legalize, the activists of euthanasia propose a "service" from all possible spheres. Oh, talk about yakis "zapobizhnikh come in" and "obmezhenih obstavin" - the doorway is nonsense. Kintseva meta - euthanasia began to pass and without any vibration.

Shift zEnglish Maria Stroganova for "Pravoslav'ya i svit"

Arguments "AGAINST"

• - From a religious point of view, suicide is a sin.
• - The value of human life is an important argument against euthanasia. How can one person bring life to one another?
• - Brush alternatives - just a vague argument, which was the term for euthanasia about euthanasia, for example, in Great Britain, for a lot of rock. Much more, there was a bully against euthanasia, in favor of a palatial aid. A palliative help is a help for people with nevilikovnyh ailing so that the stench of yakomog suffered less and how they lived more beautifully, because they were deprived of the stench.
• - The area was stolen - being beaten for the evil of euthanasia, wrongly victorious. You can ask for euthanasia for the last year, and tomorrow you can also ask for new relatives who want to better reject the decline.
• - Social and ethical shkodi for culture. In all, to visit the innuendo of euthanasia, it’s like a galmo, seeing that it’s not right from the point of view of culture. It stinks to talk about those who are guilty of euthanasia, but they are betrayed.

All the arguments are good in theory, but require some confirmation. You can't just say: "Tse was stolen by the area." It is necessary to vivchate the nutritional value, to learn from real practice. So, it’s not just our world.

Article 45 of the Law "On the Basics of Protecting the Health of Huge People in the Russian Federation" has the following lines: fixing piece entries for the patient's life. "

Ale in the 7th clause of article 66 є such a tsikaviy moment:

"Reanimation come not carried out: 1) when classic deaths(The improvement of vital functions to the human body (blood circulation and dichanna) is potentially reversible in nature at the last moment of the day it signifies death to the brain) on the progression of the reliable establishment of non-violent guests for the minds of non-violent

Against euthanasia, there are such arguments, such as:

• 1. An active euthanasia swing for such a value, like a human life.
• 2. Possibility of diagnostics and prognostic pill of the drug.
• 3. Possibility to discover new medicines and methods of treatment.
• 4. Evidence of effective diseases.
• 5. Rizik izlozhivan from the side of the staff. It’s about those who, at the same time, if euthanasia is active, will be legalized, the medical personnel have a focus on vikoristovuvati її doesn’t think about those who are interested in the interests of the child, but also about the men, people, people. In numerical discussions about euthanasia, every hour they sleep in our press, the argument is victorious, mabut, often for all of them.

ARGUMENTS "FOR" and "AGAINST" legalization of euthanasia

In such a rank, to go, but do not carry out reanimation, or take reanimation for the sick person - the euthanasia. And not to carry out reanimation through those who death insists on the progression of nevilikovnyh ailments - it is possible for a mandate. It’s like a new mess і chaos, so whether it’s like attaching a piece of life to a piece of life or not getting help is illegal.

For Russia this is actual:

• - Development of paliative assistance. Tse in the UK you can say, uh palliative assistance more not pratsyuє and demand go to euthanasia. Russia will need to turn around to discuss the legalization of euthanasia only because it wants to get rid of it for the development of palatial assistance.
• - Adequate legislative basis, as it seized the autonomy of the patient and allowed him to be seen from intensive treatment, if he didn’t want to.
• - Navi, if we will have legalized euthanasia, the need for vrahovuvati deyaki speeches. For example, national specialties: the role of family, religion, culture. Russia is on the whole plan and it is on the road, below Holland.
• - Robot over the judiciary. Absolutely all things that are said can be boldly re-christened, to that with such judgments, as with us, legalization of euthanasia is impossible in any case.

Entry

The problem of euthanasia was formed in the distant past, and even then, the number of supernumerals among physicians, philosophers and lawyers was victorious. The imposition of the death of a sick person until the moment of death, to see the country’s living in the background, was not unambiguous.

The growth of respect for euthanasia is tied not only to advances in medicine, but to changes in the system of moral and spiritual values, to the priorities of human rights. The relevance of the idea by those who are important to re-evaluate, in the first place, through those who are tied with the eye-witnesses, but among the people, - to their lives, and in a different way - through the little vivification of the given problem, the lack of illumination in the ancestors of the Church and practically on the basis of the prevailing legal acts in the legislation of the country.

The problem of euthanasia is not only legal, but rather turns the moral side. It gave me a great practical meaning, allowing the protection of the rights and legitimate interests of the people of the community.

In Russia in science, the euthanasia has been preserved by the representatives of the science galuzei, zokrem S.Yu. Bikovoi, A.P. Gromovim, A.P. Zilber, A. Ya. Ivanushkin, B.G. Yudina, P.P. Kalinovskiy, M.N. Maleikoy, S.G. Stetsenko and ін .. Uvaga to tsієї those are not vipadkovo. Obviously, in our country, it’s not only and not the style of purely scientific interest, but the sharpening of the real problems of the Russian suspension. ale i legal scienceі the legislation of the most prosperous in the socially related lands to face the need to accept the historical wikliku, tied to the appearance of new views and ideas, which can change the image of wishing to live for people,

The originality of the situation, the legal situation, as well as the active processes in the sphere of social and economic development, the need for a new understanding of the problem of euthanasia.

In real life, show euthanasia even more versatile and do not invest in an hour in the current declaration about her. In fact, those who are so versatile of thoughts about the day-to-day of euthanasia will be explained by the abundant aspect of this phenomenon, by the lack of it.

In general, they are characterized by my vibir those. Ale not only that. The relevance of the practice is supported by a great number of scientific articles on this topic.

About the end of the given robot is also a manifestation of a suspicious life, like euthanasia.

The subject is euthanasia, as well as the designation of euthanasia.

Meta robots: grasp the problem of euthanasia.

Dosyagnennya meti transfer setting and solution of the offensive stake zavdan:

vivchiti I'll go back to the testimonial euthanasia,

look at the arguments "for" and "against" euthanasia,

analyze the problem from different aspects.

poachiti, yaka practice in the row of the country svitu.

The robot will be stored in the entry, seven points, in the list of the victorian literature.

1. The right to life and the right to death

One of the most important rights and freedoms є the right to life, declared by Art. 20 of the Constitution, but it is not possible to understand the right in the form of the other constitutional provisions, such as a human being. The mechanism of realizing constitutional rights is even more folding, and not all Lankans knew the mechanism of law more than legislation - such a Lanka is euthanasia.

There is a right of people to die for the fate of physicians є spirny, ale maє yakis sense and not very legally organized, there has been an expansion in the small lands in connection with the problem of euthanasia.

Until the end of the 18th century. Bulo declared the right of people to live. Alec about the right to death in that period was so obsolete. Wanting in the meanings of the period and in the general abundance of philosophers talked about the need to be recognized and the right of a man to die, about the right to voluntary death є as natural as the right to live. Tim is an hour staging a meal about the right to death, as it was meant in the history of philosophical thought, є paradoxical and vimagaє to be specified. For example, about the yak, the strong, the death is: natural, unnatural, easy, bright, heroic, heroic on the battlefield, with the rights protected by the law and the interests of the individual, suspension, power, primus, voluntary, alien. As well as the article on the position of the sub'єkta, which, here, is the right to life, stuck in the situation of the choice between lives and death, then it’s a lot of people who feed themselves, and there is no reason to vote against people’s rights. for life and death. The insult is right so tightly tied, as both sides of the same medal, with such a delicacy and cry, which requires special protection from her. However, with the right to death, vinikє means more food, lower than the right to live.

Why not euthanasia with a try to justify the baiduzhst, the baiduzhst of the suspension to the share of incapacities from childhood, ailments to cancer, patients of the class, how to be in a com? On the thought of adherents of euthanasia, such individuals are unhappy, accustomed to being aware, like death, in connection with which death is easy and quick, for them a good blessing. Hey, maybe you’re not happy, they don’t smell, but that’s the temptations to intervene with them? І hiba lyudin "not like that, as we should" not be close to all "before my natural stature" і, such a rank, less than "visions of guilt from happiness"? the last moment of action life. ”Ale, as a lot of somatic rights, and right - a jerlo of changes, especially if there is interest in specialness, support and power.

In such a rank, vynikak nutrition: why is the right to death and viplivia wondered if the right to life? In the history of philosophical thought, you can create a series of ideas for food. One step is the right to death є the realization of the human right to life. As soon as people have the right to live, we cannot fail to recognize their right to death (such, zokrema, Bula position of F. Nietzsche).

Another idea is based on the fact that the right to death is vivid from the right of people to life (such is the position of F. Bacon). It is immoral and inhumane to motivate people to live, like, in agony, to pray for death. The right to death is a guarantee of the preservation of the identity. However, the freedom of will is the transmission and the responsibility (both morally and legally) of the one who took the decision and the decision of the vicon. Yak writing J.-P. Sartre: “Lyudina is judged by her booty. Judgments to that, not having melted it for itself; and all the same, it’s vilny, to that, one time throwing at the svit, promising for everything, how to rob ”. Vikoristovuchi freedom of will, people to rob vibir, and that means, promising for those who are seen - this is one of the broader positions in the history of philosophy, captured by Aristotle.

At the same time, the morality of the people for the early grapevine can only be attributed to the thought of a greater number of philosophers, as in a new buv vibir. What kind of vibration in a hopelessly ailing people - nutrition is not easy, as it is not simple for eating: who is guilty to bear witness in the case of euthanasia - a deadly ailment of people, who accepted a solution about euthanasia, but what?

Another aspect of the pre-juvenile problem was taken up in robots by S.L. Frank. The robot "Reality and Lyudin" is in writing, that the state and the right of the goiters to seize the lives of people from the mouths of the land and the free will, show them around. On a yogi thought, amalgamation of the possibilities of vicarious somatic rights є fencing life from the teeth of the inheritance of the spiritual will, and to that it is permissible and justified. Constitutional obmezhenya somatic rights of the people became a real calling factor, which took the bias of the day of the day of sin (moral evil) in people.

It is necessary to note that S.L. Frank zovsim not calling out to the organizing-primus interconnection of "freedom of the grave will". The state is not guilty of engaging in internal misconceptions of people, it is guilty that they are not responsible for the call, they are most friendly for the internal self-perfected people. It may be less about those who have the right not only to guarantor of the natural rights and freedoms of the individual, and even to interconnect them quietly, as to supervise the “ideal ear of holiness”. Otzhe, baked superblots, which are conducted around the freedom of will from the hour of Socrates, wikipedia with a special life of significance to the whole problem, which especially manifested itself in the understanding of such a phenomenon, such as euthanasia. In view of the problem of freedom of will, to lay down the knowledge of the people’s valence for their children, including when the decision is taken about death and, more importantly, for the death of this people.

At the connection with the cim in the history of philosophical thought, two clear-cut were seen: one, to go out of the free will of the people, given the right to die, and, in fact, as it has come to an end so much that people have never lived so much about their time as the death of the people, let it go, and everything is in the hands of God.

At my glance, there are no arguments against the void of the people's right to life and death, but two rights are clearly interconnected. Realization of the right to life is to be created in a special way and to transfer the ordered people to their own courts, including voluntarily to take decisions about living. Possibility of independent ordering of one's life, including the news of food about it, є one of the legal provisions of the right of people to life. Obviously, for the very reason in the RF CC of the Russian Federation and the other regions, the criminal suspicion for trying to commit suicide has not been transferred. Nichto does not have the right to cross people, because I have the right to death, in the presence of this right - including the state, as the guarantor in the realization of the rights and freedoms of the people. The power, bringing people into the right to death, bordering on freedom, re-realizing the right to life in the bounds of life.

At my glance, the fence of euthanasia is unconstitutional. It is necessary to contradict the principles of securing freedom and human happiness. The behavior of the big man is in children. with a high rizik for a vlasy life, the power is not to be defended, but to mean, bit by bit, the right of the hulks to die. For example, the spokesmen of the Federal Service vikonannya punished the Russian Federation in the taken oath to swear, "do not shkoduyuh his life, protect the provisions of the Constitution and laws of the Russian Federation legal order."

Having analyzed the norms of the Constitution, it is possible to create new rules, but the legislation does not exceed the provisions of the meritorious Constitution, but it is directly connected with the wickedness. One day the life of a huge man is guilty of ending with a one year death.

2. Understanding and ways of euthanasia

religious euthanasia suspension

In our hour, if science has reached the endless heights in rural areas and a human thought has penetrated into the most recent coils of suspicious svidomosty, it is still necessary to see food, but it is superbly more important not only in the theoretical, but in the practical aspect. Euthanasia: what is it? gross violation of the rights of people At the same time, the food supply is not only in front of physicians and lawyers, but all the people are looking at it.

The term "euthanasia" resembles the walnut words: "eu" - good and thanatos - death. In such a rank, the literal translation of the term is priceless and death is easy. In the literature, it is possible to develop differently written terms: euthanasia, euthanasia. To be impressed, the scientific status of the term has been raised by the founders of the English philosopher of the era of the Renaissance, Francis Bekon, who was victorious in his treatise "About the love and the application of sciences"

In academic records, it is possible to develop the development of the meaning of the term.

"Euthanasia is the immediate death of a sick person who is not sick from the death of his fellow citizen." (Great medical encyclopedia)

“Eutanazia (eutanazia) - immediately accelerated death, or the death of a sick person who is not sick with the death of a fellow citizen; behind the radianskim legislation to look out for yak zlochin. " (Great Encyclopedic Glossary 1991)

Those names are repeated word for word in the new encyclopedic vocabulary, ale the phrases - "food about the permissibility of euthanasia to be discussed" (Novy encyclopedic vocabulary; 2001)

"Euthanasia is the practice of relieving the life of people for the sake of letting go of the physical citizens of the trivial Komi as a result of the nevilik or degenerative ailments" (Oxford Encyclopedia)

"Euthanasia, also called mercy killing, is a whole practice, aimed at eliminating painless deaths in individuals who suffer from pain in case of non-violent ailments or physical problems" (British encyclopedia).

The most important term in the given hour is seen by lawyers: "Euthanasia is a" act ", the work of special medical personnel, as you can turn around the child (for example, introduced by the doctor of the lethal dose lykarsky drug) Absence of idleness (for example, visualization of reanimation visits). A priceless act, in the basis of which lies the namir (meta) drug to speed up the death of the patient for the quiet of their motives (koristi for mercy). The basis of euthanasia is the will of the patient or his loved ones. The patient, who is euthanasia, is incurable, and euthanasia is "painless".

Do not be astonished at deyakі vіdminnostі in the sightings of sight, it is possible to see the presence everywhere in the distant moments - the death of a man and the pangs of death of yakomog more painless, be in any available ways.

On the basis, you can see the characteristic signs for euthanasia:

Ailments are guilty of seeing without interruption, unbearable citizens, vicious nevilikovnoy (for medical indications) ailments.

Cut off your life, or speed up death, maybe not a lyudin, but only a medical doctor.

The patient is guilty of his own free will, because he has developed his freedom to drink from life, because if it is not in the wake of clearly influencing his will, then the failure is guilty of going out of his closest relatives.

Euthanazia, yak new way the medical solution to the problem of death (life) to enter the practice of daily protection of health for two main officials. In the first place, the progress of medicine, zokrem, for the inward development of reanimatology, allowing the death of a sick person to be prevented, in order to work in the mode of management of the dying. In other words, the change of values ​​and moral priorities in the current civilization, in the center of which is the idea of ​​"human rights".

For a more general view of the problem, it is necessary to make a further understanding and try to classify the possible options for euthanasia. In literature, it is often possible to develop euthanasia for active and passive, voluntary and primus, as well as for direct and indirect. Easy to understand basic information.

Passive euthanasia (or, as I call it, "the method of the inserted syringe") is to turn in the fact that one should lean forward to the continuation of the life of medical assistance, which hastened the onset of natural death. In practice, it is often observed in our country.

Under active euthanasia ("the method of a syringe"), the sense of introducing to the dying of some likarsky chi іnіyu, for example, to pull on a quick release and painless death.

Active euthanasia can be seen in offensive forms:

) "Driving from mercy" is seen in quiet vipadki, if there is a drug, bachachi are sick citizens of hopelessly ailing people that being unable to put them down, for example, to inject you with an overdose of an anti-sickly drug;

) "Suicide assisted by a likarem" is recognized, if likar only additionally assists ailing people to leave their lives;

) Vlasno active euthanasia can be found without the help of a doctor. The patient himself turns on the auxiliary attachment, as bi himself puts his hands on himself.

Such a rank, the criterion of seeing in this particular type is є position, which is borrowed by doctors.

As a criterion for euthanasia on the voluntary and primus in the position of the patient. Dobrovilna euthanasia transferring the message of the most ailing one. Primusova is able to respect the visibility of the specific will. With such a rank, from voluntary euthanasia to the mind of a sick person who is suffering from light and turbulent death due to the comprehension of a sick person for the help of other medicines and other diseases. From the primus euthanasia to think "to the easy and turbulent death of the people, not for their sake, but for the decisions of their relatives, the support and the legislative institutes." In the first place, primus euthanasia can be misplaced at the time of pouring into the will of the patient from the side of the lykar, close patients, or even the third person (for example, by the way, get rid of, pollute, blackmail, pour into the homeland, perhaps, etc.); in another way, you can talk about primus euthanasia in quiet vipadkas, if the car is fiercely haunted by the passages of your loved ones, or even the old ones asleep, in writing, for additional signs, etc.) .

Combining the formation of euthanasia, we accept chotiri ways (situations) of euthanasia: voluntary and active; voluntary and passive; unfriendly and active; unkind and passive.

To drive the first situation (voluntary and active euthanasia) and the fourth (involuntary and passive) faults, both “for” and “against” are met. In the drive of the third situation (involuntary and active euthanasia), thoughts, naturally, are often negative for everything. Those, who depend on the corny of euthanasia, as a rule, ignore the situation for a friend, if euthanasia is voluntary from the side of the sick and passive from the side of the lykar.

As a criterion for euthanasia on the direct and indirect presentation of the motivation of the medical practitioner. Direct euthanasia of transferring to the knowledge of manpulations, which are guilty without prior, so bi-moving, in a "one-way" order, lead to the entrance of the patient from life. Indirectly or indirectly, euthanasia means that being vicarious as a physician is a deprivation of Lanka in a lancet diy, leading to a fatal result ("subordinate effect"). In the tsyu category, the mediated death rate is included in the case of a prescribed increased dose of drugs with the use of zenoluvannya.

Such a rank seems to be possible for the formation of the offensive of the Visnovka. The same terminology is the meaning of the understanding of the euthanasia dosi in the day. The current classification is not adequate to transfer all the changes in the situation, which are found. On the thought of the visiting Russian reanimatologist A.P. Zilber, the author of "a treatise on Euthanasia",

3. "For" and "against". Ethical assessment of euthanasia

The problem of euthanasia at the current stage has become a topical issue in our suspension. With the development of the suspension, take a look at the state of affairs. All in all, the food is about replacing such a principle, like humanism, for the release of the people of the people for the help of euthanasia.

The problem of comprehending the stagnation of euthanasia is twofold: “for” and “against”.

Arguments for the euthanasia's corny are even more versatile, but when they are closest, they are not so numerous. Shvidshe for everything, the skin is new, the argument will be deprived of the options on the topic of the already obvious ones in the arsenals of the euthanasia mirkuvan.

I will try to lead the argument to the reproach of the fact that euthanasia goes beyond the framework of unjust imposition.

Life is the blessing only todi, if, in general, contentedness prevails over fellow citizens, positive emotions - over negative ones. It is worth noting that the argument of the camp of people is the same as it is more beautiful to die, not to prodovzhuvati life. We will use the butt of such a situation for those children who suffer from severe pains or living in a degraded wilderness from those who are happy with their basic needs.

The most beautiful point of view is the vislov, Mabut, the philosopher Fridrikh Nitsche: “It is already obscene for the singing life of the far. Life in the slackness of the households and apparatuses, because of that, because of the sense and the right to live, it is guilty of contempt for the suspension ... It is already unhappy to live proudly, I want to die proudly. "

Opponents of euthanasia suggest two points. First: it is incorrect to interpret the "kelkosti" of the citizens and the good, because here the prototypes of the lives are in the form of the citizens and in the everyday life in the same biological form. Life is a blessing to see todi, if it becomes more important to the fellow citizens (and it’s a lot of people who look like this, and if it’s okay, to visit the call is a happier life ...). To a friend. Arguments for the admissibility of euthanasia are that it is the will of the ailing one, that is, it’s just the right to suicide. However, not everything, that is, the right to euthanasia, the moral right to suicide.

Prihilniks of euthanasia postulate that life can be respected in a good doth, if you are in good shape, in the field of culture, moral accusations. Having degraded to the essence of a vital, prehuman level, you can get rid of ethical sanctions, and you can see how the food about її prypinennya is not more than food about those chipping and hanging wood.

The whole argument is hostile, persh for everything, its own empty empty space, more than the outer side of human life іsnu її inner side... I didn’t actually degrade before any kind of zoological, dewy plant, but it doesn’t mean that a person is ready to be put up to herself, even to her relatives in such a camp, as well as to be put up to a dead tree, or even to the buzzards. Here it is pre-verbal crap about putting people to the dead to the remains of their brothers-in-arms: graves є the subject of a mischievous set-up, і it looks like an indicator of a stooge to quiet people, talking about some kind of stench є. As soon as it is moral to put people up to the people to expand on their remains, then it is more guilty that they are more guilty on the living, do not let them get sick with ailments.

It is morally permissible to give help to someone in the polish of their position. If you want to be killed, you want to do it yourself, if you want to do it yourself, how could you be killed in the life of an undeserving human child? How can it be that an act is unfair? Yak zagalі tse maybe wrong? And what about voluntary euthanasia, why not?

The argument has serious shortcomings. Why is it efficient to kill "hopeless" patients as a single alternative to inactivity? And what did vzagal mean "polіpshiti stanovische"?

As a matter of fact, there are two types of vbivstva to get to the bagatma from the most inveterate opponents of euthanasia - self-defense and punishment. Joden of them is not є unjust; by the day, it is not evil among them. How can you see voluntary euthanasia as the third kind of true death?

This is an argument in four quarters, which, however, does not showcase ethical criticism and is sooner of a mercantile nature. Adopting life at the stage of life, or at the vegetative stage, because of the help of advanced technologies, is too expensive. And the same - the cattle, as it turns out to look at life in desperate situations, it would be used on those who like dozens, hundreds of people, ailments like to go to love.

"The right to death" can easily turn into a threat to the life of the children, to the liking of any marriage of cats. In such a rank, euthanasia can be respected by driving or by suicide, in the absence of such a role to be imposed on the patient.

The ethical assessment of euthanasia is not unambiguous. On the skin argument “for” there is a separate argument “against”.

Hackers of euthanasia talk about the possibility of a choice, about those who don't have the right to feel desperate ailments in the gorstoki torment, about those who are growing thin and frustrated by the extremes of their citizens, about those who are often desperate kudi zhakhliv_shim methods of suicide, nіzh painless ін'єкція.

Do not be serious, and tell me quietly, that it does not matter to permissible euthanasia. For example, on a dummy, it is not possible to call on the politicians for the death of people. Smell beastly respect for those who develop medicine more quickly, and now know how to treat ailments that have recently become hopeless; In such a rank, including the patient from the systems of life-safety, we will give my chance to return to see the symptoms of this ailment.

Great is also the evilness of the evil on the side of relatives, as they pay for the despair of the hopelessly sickly (for clearing out the slump, like, mindlessly, if I’m less than that, I’ll become a medicinal vitrati of the master). Greedy relatives can join the medical team and fix the grip on the person who is living, so that they can imagine their life as voluntary, in that hour as for the good of the year on euthanasia it will be done in a grip.

Ale golovna і actionably unrelated ethical problem continues to be ailing, as it’s not in the minds of self-consciously to take decisions about those who are more useful to life: to be in a com, rosy inconsistent, turn on the watchfulness of the little ones. For them, as if euthanasia was legalized, it would be virishuvati htos іnshy. Who are likars, relatives or representatives of power? First of all, will this decision be dictated by the spirit of humanism and the interests of the sick? Even the memory of the fascist programs has not yet been erased by the programs of "improving the nation" by the gentry of mass oppression of the dumb, mentally ill, indifferent, homosexuals, "racially discordant" ...

M.I. Kovalov vvazhaє, that an active euthanasia cannot be legalized and served until the end of the service lifeless bureaucrats. Among them, there is a great number of pompous diagnoses, the ability to understand the thermal and pre-terminal stages, the rapid development of medicine and pharmacology, which allows the elimination of the problem.

S. Wulf stverdzhu, since euthanasia is permissible, then the politicians will not need to indulge in the sickness of the sick people, the more citizens are sick and "if euthanasia is more accessible, we will be more interested in taking the tour around"

Analyze the camp, when it’s true, it’s right, it’s important, but it’s topical at the same time є food is not about those who do not allow the drug users to consume euthanasia, but about those who are for what minds and who have the right to control over zd_ysnennya.

4. Moral aspects

"Euthanasia" can be meaning like "killing the people for the transfer of the good of killing" for that year ("voluntary euthanasia"), for without harm, or against the will of the people ("involuntary" and "primusov"). For "killing" I am mindful for admitting things, picking up people’s life for the sake of letting go of life, so that, right away, it’s injected directly or indirectly.

It is common knowledge that the suicide attacks behind the help of the drug are not in the minor world, there is no fatal injection by the drug user, it is the butt of euthanasia, which stench is straightened to one and this life of death. As well as suicide is permissible, it is important to know that it is morally forbidden against active voluntary euthanasia. It is possible, є practical motives for їх awareness. (For example, help in suicide can be less tolerated.)

First, there are two meals about euthanasia-moral ("How can you say about the character of a people, how good are they?"); St. Thomas Aquinas stverdzhu, scho in the zalny, human law is guilty of grounding on the natural law - the fence for people to rob those who are not wrong for them - not lawmaking, but tyranny. Ale, - prodovzhu vin, - morality and ideal legitimacy are not the same. Inodі those, scho from the point of view of morality is rotten, it is not practically legal to fence. Є besides, the power can be hardened by people.

At the same time, those who admit morality, may be protected by law, for an hour for the welfare we are brought up to see our rights.

Offense at the time of the negotiation of euthanasia. Deyakі vverdzhuyut, well, I want euthanasia immoral, її does not go to the fence in the legislative order. There are two arguments that you want to suggest as an argument against the stagnation of criminal sanctions: in the first place, it’s a lot of vitrati for the integration of these sanctions into life, and in a different way, the prospect of hearinglessness is wide-ranging, as long as you still know the law vypadku not stasis.

Інші look, well, if euthanasia is not wrong for all kinds of people, it’s innocent but is allowed by law. One of the options for the argument is that euthanasia is morally permissible in small families, but it’s impossible to find a fence there, because it’s so easy to sinister, because the legalization of the good of euthanasia has brought nothing. The first option is to make sure that the legalization of putting people in a twisted camp is a choice: either to prodzhuvati life, or to die of drinking from the road, it is impossible to put anything in it.

J. Rachels vvazhaє, as well as ailments in svidomosty, rose, but on the other day of the policy, you can’t endure physical citizens more an hour to do it. In this situation there is a deadly one (euthanasia is active), on the thought of J. Rachels, more humane.

Most of them are not good for him, and for everything that goes beyond the principles of humanism and the significance of medicine. The value of the human life sponukaє fighting for it against the objectival medical laws and in the desperate situations themselves (moreover, it is medical practice to find a way to fix the desperate ailments themselves).

One of the reasons why it is so important to bash people is more important from a moral point of view, the view of an active and passive euthanasia, a glimpse of the fact that, behind these manifestations, in the moral sense of the future, beat someone to help someone, not a person.

Now it means that, by the way, how to mark the type of euthanasia in the name of not similar to the guidance. The stench is not motivated by special weather conditions and does not mean that normal healthy children are deprived of it. Likari tsіkavlyatsya tіlki thіs vipad, for which life is no longer needed by the patient, but rather became a non-bar, become a frustrating thug for a newcomer. Tim is no less, the same point of view is lost in power and in the number of problems: the difference is insignificant in the way of driving in and out of hand in the process of not setting moral awareness. Yakshcho likar zalishaє paciєnta die from the humane world, it is in the same moral position, if the patient is lethal in the humane world. If you take the decision incorrectly (for example, at times, if the patient's ailment is for the sake of vilikovna), it would appear, however, let us summarize right away from the fact that the method was victorious for the sake of success. And as long as the decision of the doctor is correct, the method itself is not important by itself.

Legal discourse to become an interest in the plan of quiet visnovs, to which it is natural to produce the logic of an autonomous choice, is based on the doctrine of "human rights". Take care of the individualistic tolmachenia taken in happy theory law, most of the lawyers sent a letter about the provisions of the suspension of the guarantor of all types and forms of euthanasia (Dmitriyev Yu.A. and Shleneva I.V., Malinovskiy A., Tasakov S. and I.). In accordance with these statutes of the Constitution of the Russian Federation, in which the right to life, freedom and the lack of accessibility to the special person is guaranteed, the stench to ground the right of individuals to order their lives, including those who want to see V.A. ., Borodin S, Glushkov V., Konyushkina Yu.A.). Deyakі lawyers proponyuyut vinesti euthanasia in the category of dіyan, as transferring the opinion about the opinion for quiet people, as її zdіysnyut (Ivchenko O.).

At the same hour, there is a demand for it, that in the gates of the given discourse there is a turn and a critically negative position before the establishment of euthanasia (Kruss V.I.) Allowing a person to be brought to suicide, as it is the essence of an individual diyu), or by this circumstance, since the right to life does not even mean the right to death (Chernega K.A.).

It’s a lot of people to be afraid that the formal dose of euthanasia could become a singing psychological galma for the joke of new more effective people in diagnostics and ill health, as well as inadvertence in anticipation of such a medical problem. Reanimation of assistance is not only the great material vitrates, but the majestic springs of the physical and mental strength of the service staff. The very sight of a good cheating and a glance can provoke a gravely ill person to speed up a fatal result, so that the drug can be pinned down, like a lick and a look behind him. First and foremost, one of the reasons for the need for legal regulation of this food.

The thought became bigger, that euthanasia from a moral point of view is permissible for vinyatkovy vypadki, but in such vyadki vypadki go to legitimize. Not long-standing legislative initiatives in quiet countries, de von, it is allowed to allow euthanasia only in vinyatka vypadki.

5. Euthanasia and churches

The Church will raise the condemnation of euthanasia. It’s zasudzhennya to be afraid of any encroachment on human life - like abortion, so in the case of euthanasia. However, in the food about the life of the piece life, the church is not so categorical and goes with such principles.

If there is the least chance of getting out of a comatose stump, it is necessary to vikoristovuvat all possible methods in order to create a child's life. It is especially important to do it, if the ailment is not self-evident to its own age. If a comatose camp is irreversible, then it is not obligatory to choose more and expensive methods of both material and special character. A piece of human life during the increase in mental activity, reflexes, self-motivated behavior and heartbeat was bolstered by the dying and important trauma for his relatives.

Christianity in the main form against euthanasia. The main arguments are based on the fact that life is given by God, people and death are in the hands of God. To that, human beings do not concede the right to take away the life of the people, do not know how to die yourself. The process of being spiritually important and re-privatizing is not guilty. For those who feel sick, death and death of the sufferer is a spiritual feat of love and mercy. I was suffering until the end and I was taken to the land of flour on Golgotha, I accepted the pitta, so yes zabuttya

In connection with the cims, it means and intelligence of Christian philosophy by those of the country. On one side, the countrymen is the result of the sinfulness of the people, the stench sent by God for the sin. From іnshogo - countrymen - tse divinely viprobuvannya. Ale in be-like vipadi їkh demand, take it with submission. Zvidsi euthanasia is a manifestation of the evil will of the people, which is in spite of the will of the divine. Lyudina has no right to order her life. The Christian glance at the human life shows the very possibility of self-imposed repentance. And not only that, as a gift, the messages of God. Everything, wіn daє ludinі, wіkono wіth a sense. Zvidsy bezgluzdikh citizens do not buvaє. The countrymen, especially before death, purify the soul of people from the graves, ready to live their lives. When I am sick of a human life, so it’s like it і be-like a viprobuvannya, є “I’ll take it all the time,” writing Grigoriy Palamas.

In such a rank, God has bestowed life on people, and only for wine, and you can take it away from people. Behind all the twists and turns of human life, the idea of ​​God is visible. “One cannot preserve one's own life, or one's own moral worth, if one wants to give himself to a human being. Vin is not able to spare himself neither from this forest nor from spiritual death. "

If the person was free of will, and when the hour of her death began, then it was the torture of death that was caused by the words.

The Church is negatively placed before euthanasia, protesting with a lot of nuances. So, Pope John Paul II pid hour of the audition, yaku gave the participants international congress gastroenterologists, having nurtured the absolute inadmissibility of euthanasia, the clever and active relief of the life of the sick, have more detailed information on the nutrition about the more important doctors in the opposite direction - the advanced life. “Surely, we are to blame for the great success of medical science, technology and pharmacology,” said Tato. - However, you can’t forget it, but a lyudin is mortal. It is necessary to put to the sick with a healthy realism, so, the sick person did not have an illusion about the omnipotence of drugs. "

Patriarch of Moscow and All Russia Alexiy II stuck in front of his choric preconceptions of the problem of euthanasia, meaning that “there’s a lot of gross suicide, protesting the number of deaths of a terrible fatality from the skin. The main reason for this is the visibility of meti in life, nevira in life. "

Biblіine "Thou shalt not kill" is indiscriminately tied with the negative appointees of Christianity to suicide. The church is also about the familiarity of samovbivts for eternal death, and is seen by the priest for the Christian rite. The rigidity of the Christian appointing to suicide in zagala and to the euthanasia of zokrem is tied to the life of the people who live without social security. To find such an adversary of Christianity, like F. Nietzsche, having recognized that one of the reasons for the social recognition of Christianity was the same in this uncompromising struggle against the "nevgamovnoy battle against suicide," which became really widened by Christianity until the hour of the last (1st).

In Buddhism, deceitfully from life, it is by its own means that one is preoccupied with "visceral", for example and physiological "criteria" for suicide are practically all over the place. Suicide in the Buddhist culture is a kind of religious rite, and it’s not marvelous, but blessedness and bazhana meta life is located in the posture of the whole life - in “nebutti” (nirvana). See suicide, accepted in Buddhist culture, culture. Їх vibir to lay down from a particular sect, land, era. Ce і hungry death, і drowning in the waters of "sacred ryochok", і steamed up his belly with his own powerful hands.

Iudaism is categorically aware of the active euthanasia, so that in order to avoid the lethal result (to ask if someone else is asking for help), I see an act like driving people in. For some people, however, it is permissible to give such a few words, as if the stench is necessary to relieve the pain, or the citizens of a sick person, to see the deaths of those who may be near death.

Islam against euthanasia. Muslims live, that only Allah is virish, like people live. "Do not drive people in, krіm yak by right, even tse baroniv Allah", - says the Koran (17, 33). It is familiar to the Islamic Code of Medical Ethics, “a drive from mercy, so it’s like a suicide, you know, you’re going to see it in an atheistic way of thinking, you’ve got into it, as long as our earthly life has gone empty. Vimoga drive in, to change the countrymen, to see. " However, the piece of life in the room with a rose, the code is not important for the need.

6. Legalization of euthanasia

In the other half of the XX century. Discussion about the legalization of euthanasia (Evtel) flared up in the light

in the context of humanity. However, it is impossible to say that the light spirit in the whole is more suitable

the improvement of humanity in relation to the disease. Legislation of the Bagatyokh powers are solidarity in the fact that

euthanasia is unacceptable. І tim is not less than є land, in which won legal rights.

However, the powers that be, the de-nourishment of euthanasia still knows its positively legal call. First, the problem was broken in Australia, de in 1996 the law on the legalization of euthanasia was adopted. Not far away from the protest, the draft law was echoed in nine months. This year's euthanasia in Australia has been fenced in, and for the destruction of the fence, a person may be sued by a court to the point of relinquishing his will.

Perfection in nutrition of legalization of euthanasia loan Holland. There, on April 2, 2002, there was a law "About living for the bosses or I will help in suicide", which legalized the possibility of assisting in suicide and euthanasia. Behind the tsim is the law of the skin, hto dossyag 16 rock_v, I have the right to independently, by virtue of the order, and the way of completing one's life. For physical persons from 12 to 16 years, for the validation of the act, it is necessary for the father of some legal representatives. Likar, who is healthy for euthanasia, is guilty of being guilty of the fact that the passing of a sick self is well thought out, and the citizen is trivial and intolerable. Krym, on the lycarya to rely on the liabilities to inform the patient about his country and the prospect.

Belgium became the other power in the light, as the legislation adopted the idea of ​​legalization of euthanasia. On the 23rd of February 2002, the parliament of the whole state, having adopted the law, has become legal for the sake of euthanasia and help in suicide, as if to avenge the legislation of Holland. It is known by law that the right to euthanasia may be imposed on individuals who have reached 18 years. If a patient cannot see his prokhannya, then for his choice, prokhanna about euthanasia can be a visitor to a person who has reached the point. In Belgium, the procedure for euthanasia may also be transferred by the legislation of the Netherlands.

Freehand prior to the legalization of euthanasia in the United States. Thus, in the legislation of all states, euthanasia and suicide become illegal and unacceptable. On the other hand, reflections in the American legal system have a great role to play the precedent, so that in 1994, in the first place, euthanasia was recognized as permissible in 1976. Oregon Death with Dignity Act. The whole legislative act entered into action through three rockets, submitted to the decision of the US Supreme Court. As a matter of fact, a resident of Oregon, who had a great mind about his life and his cheruvats, had no illnesses, because of his family’s problems, the accolades to die in the closest family, he had no right to ask for suicide for his reason.

There are many other powers in the world that do not recognize the evil nature of the evil deed for the euthanasia. Before them, in the morning, Switzerland, Nimechchin, Switzerland and Finland are admitted, the euthanasia is de-passive to go beyond the legal translation; Columbia, de it is permissible to zd_ysnyuvati under certain circumstances, passive euthanasia; Japan, a special procedure of passive euthanasia has been broken down. The first croc before the legalization of passive euthanasia was killed by the parliamentary of France. So, in 2004, the stench of the stink of a big, big voices was caught by the bill, as it was proponated to legalize and passive euthanasia. A special law is the presence in the new law of a sickly sick patient of vimagati, as well as the possibility of storing strong, sickly sick people by the drug, as if to hasten the death of the patient.

In the world's leading lands, including in the SND, euthanasia is located beyond the boundaries of legal legalization. Ukraine, like Russia, clearly marked its negative position before the legalization of euthanasia. This position is absolutely justified and prompted by the European approach. Dodatkov regulation of the fence of euthanasia was transferred to st. 52 Fundamentals of Ukrainian legislation on health protection. There, zokrema, it is said that the medical forebears will defend the health of the euthanasia.

Fence of euthanasia of transmission in st. 38 The Law of the Republic of Bilorus "On the protection of health", it says about those who are medical and pharmaceutical workers in defense. The norm is analogous to the protection of euthanasia, to take revenge in Art. 27 to the Law of the Republic of Kazakhstan "On the protection of the health of huge people in the Republic of Kazakhstan". In the same article, there is about those devices that can be used only in case of death. Analogous for its wickedness of the legislative design placed in the galuzev legislation of the other regions of the SND.

In 1993, for the first time in our land, the legal decision about euthanasia was reduced. So, according to st. 45, 60 of the Fundamentals of Ukrainian Legislation on the Protection of the Health of Hulks of the Medical Personnel to Protect to Conduct Euthanasia - to Satisfy the Sorrow of the Sick about the Accelerated Death of Someone, Something Like Anything, Including to the occasional visits to the picture of life. I, as it is fair to admit acts of authoritativeness, there is also a tendency to plan for saving and giving: a similar norm was introduced in Art. 145 to the draft federal law “On health protection in the Russian Federation”.

At the same time, the so-called passive euthanasia is allowed, in other words, "voluntarily seen from medical assistance." A drug can help a person get sick, inject drugs that will ease immunity. As a result of ailments, gynes are caused by secondary infections, because organisms cannot be weakened.

If to conduct a retrospective analysis of this problem, then it is necessary to take into account the fact that the Russian criminal legislation is in

I am sorry for the death.

Due to the fact that the current legislation has legal changes that suppress evil evil in the given sphere, there is a reason for the fact that euthanasia can trickle down to interests and healthy people It’s easy to finish those who are sick (for the help of the medical staff and the unclean conscience of people) to transform them into hopeless ailments.

In addition, it is necessary to be aware of those who are not in the medical profession. non-wilderness... From the point of view of likars, it is practical to be ill (with the blame of genetic ones) medical treatment... To the understanding the "lack of vigor" є to make us wiser and to lay down with the great world in both the individual and the individual possibilities, which are evident in the given moment at the ordered doctor and the patient14. In addition, from a glance at different types of diseases, the result is often found in individual features of the organisms of the ailing and the stage of illness.

This requires a further scientific supply of food, tied with the right to life and the structure of the right, with moments of determination and assignment of the right to life. In addition, be it any kind, tied to the violation of the right of people to live, take legal decisions.

Food about euthanasia in Russia cannot be closed from the point of view of law, not from the ethical and social point of view. However, being unaffected by the severity of the observational circumstances, the suspension, the first for everything in the individual of the scientific, medical and legal spirit, I can know the proper forms of practice and overconfidence of arguments, as to help the greater mind of people in the euthanasia of people. І it is necessary to fix it from the legal clarification of the complex and important problem

visnovok

In my robot, I tried to look at the problem of euthanasia from different aspects.

In the course of the preliminaries offensive results:

The problem of euthanasia dosi becomes uninvolved. Right up to the current day before euthanasia, it should be put in a reasonable way; suspended thought cut to the hard polar points of the dawn.

liberal position

From the liberal positions, euthanasia is based on the fundamental human right - the right to die, as death is one of the only living people. The main arguments for the criminality of the recognition of voluntary euthanasia are - spivchuttya to the first and the recognition of the right of the people and the very beginning of the hour of the power of death.

conservative position

Vikoristannya to understand "mercy" and "justice" for the truth of primus euthanasia - all the way to the moody social lawlessness. In addition, the victoriousness to understand "mercy" and "justice" for the truthfulness of euthanasia is one of the signs of the rightful anti-Christianity as a form of spiritual imposture, if the sacredness and values ​​of Christianity are appropriated by "these are such strangers in the people of Christ. and the Spirit of Yogo.

The conservative position on the problem of euthanasia is simple and unambiguous. “Ethics of Orthodox Christianity is a glimpse of the possibility of changing the life of a living patient, looking at it special vipadok Vbivstva, as if it was broken without the appearance and age of the patient, or suicide, as it was sanctioned by the patient himself. "

Social and legal knowledge of euthanasia is impossible to make people feel sick and citizens. But it’s a forced and independent reason for the growth of suicide, and not only because of the motives of physical citizens, maybe.

It’s time to talk about those who cannot be categorically judged about euthanasia. Not all living situations are influenced by our theoretical reconciliation, but people who are stuck in reality with this problem, are trying to fix it. My thought has changed meaningfully in the course of writing the robotics.

Protest, do not marvel at the complexity of the problem, you need to continue to shukati gіdniy shlyakh її virіshennya, go to compromise and uniqueness extreme.

List of Victory Literature

1.Kapinus O.S. Euthanasia in the history of law. // Chorni diri. - 2005. - No. 3. - S. 456-464

2.Krilova O.S. The right to die. // Evolution of Russian law: materials of the 2nd All-Russian student scientific and practical conference 22-23 April 2004 - Yekaterinburg. - 2004 .-- S. 213-215

.Bakunin S.M. The right to life and the possibility of storing euthanasia (fragments of historical and legal advice). // History of power and law. - 2006. - No. 1. - S. 21-23

.Mishina A.I. Problems of legalization of euthanasia in the Russian Federation. // Politics and law. - 2009. - No. 1. - S. 107-110

.E.A. Prisyazhna Legalization of euthanasia in foreign lands. // Scientific bulletin of the Omsk Academy of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia. - 2009. - No. 4 (35). - S. 63-65

.Ivchenko I.O. Euthanasia yak viraz of free will and the right to death (historical and philosophical analysis) // News of the Russian State Pedagogical University IM. A.I. Herzen. - 2009. - No. 107. - S. 95-100

.Zolotarova Є.O. Legalization of euthanasia: moral and legal intercourse. // MAUP - Pravoznovets. - 2009. - No. 3. - S. 125-128

.Gyulishanova I.A. Understand and see euthanasia. // MAUP - Pravoznovets. - 2009. - No. 6. - S. 23-27

.Chernishova Yu.A. The problem of euthanasia from the position “for” and “against”. // Medicne law. - 2008. - No. 3.

.Ribin V.A. Philosophical presentation of the problem of euthanasia: methodological analysis. Abstract of a dissertation on the scientific level of Doctor of Philosophy. - Yekaterinburg - 2006.

.J. Rachels. Euthanasia is active and passive. An ethical thought. Scientific and public reading. - M. - 1990 .-- S. 205-211

.Fіlіp Foot Euthanasia. // Philosophical Sciences. - No. 6. - 1990 .-- S. 63-80

.Tasakov S. Zaborona euthanasia belittling people // Vidomosty Verkhovnoi Radi. - M .: Jurid. Literature. - 2003. - No. 2. - S. 40-42

.Munasipova E.F. Euthanasia: a ruin or a ruin of the rights of the people?

.// Actual nutrition of the criminal process in the current Russia: Mizhvuzivsky collection of science works. - Ufa: RIO BashSU. - 2003.

.Euthanasia, Kenneth Kemp (St. Thomas University, St. Paul, Minnesota, USA).

.Akopov V.I. Ethical, legal medical problems euthanasia // Medical law and ethics. - 2000. - No. 1. - S. 47-55

.Adamenko Artem. Euthanasia - murder or a gesture of mercy? # "Justify">. Pavlova Yu.V. Problems of euthanasia in law: [medical ethics]. // Healthy Gluzd. - 2005. - No. 3. - S. 56-58.

.Vorobyova L.A. Ethical problems of euthanasia // HEALTHY SENS. - No. 4 (41). - 2006 .-- S. 38-44

.Tumanov A. Evtanaziya - is it good for something? Information - Analytical Internet-Vidannya Pravda.ru

22.Stefanchuk R.O. Turn around to the food about the legalization of euthanasia in the lands of the SND: pro et contra // Law and Politics. - M .: Nota Bene, 2005, No. 7. - S. 95-106

.Siluyanova I.V. Euthanasia - moral, legal and social problems. // Orthodoxy and happiness. Information and Analytical Portal of the Saratov Eparchy of Russia Orthodox Church(# "Justify"> 24. F.V. Kondrat'ev Orthodox and ethical aspects of euthanasia. // on Sat. "Orthodox and Nutrition of Bioetics". - No. 1. - M. - 2001 .-- S. 31-32.

.Humphre D. Scho also autoeuthanasia. // Lyudin. - M. - 1992. - No. 6. - S. 30-40

Tutoring

Need additional help for vivchennya be-lybi those?

Our fahivtsi advise or give tutoring services on topics.
Submit an application from those who are designated directly at the same time, so that they know about the possibility of rejecting consultations.